The National Enquirer’s last Tom Cruise cover allegations were soegregious and inflammatory, the actor threatened to sue the tabloid.
Now the mag is digging itself an even deeper hole.
According to a so-called “world exclusive,” the Enquirer claims Cruise’s divorce from Katie Holmeshas given rise to “new questions about their daughter Suri’s paternity.”
(Seriously, what is it with theEnquirer and paternity?)
The magazine’s “sources” say Cruise “will be most disturbed over suppositions that Suri will someday ask him to take a paternity test to prove he’s her father.”
Cruise is supposedly “furious” and “outraged” by the rise of speculation that he might not be Suri’s biological dad, alleges the Enquirer, knowing full well that it itself is the publicationresponsible for spreading those baseless rumors.
The tabloid lists a number of absurd “Internet” reports to back up the premise that there’s somehow any actual debate about Cruise’s paternity.
According to the Enquirer, men including Josh Hartnett, Joshua Jackson, Chris Kleinand even deceased Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard have been mentioned as possible biological dads for Suri.
The Enquirer attributes these allegations to random websites and outlets but is more than happy to bring up a phony “controversy” regarding Suri’s 2006 birth certificate and other supposed question marks surrounding Cruise’s parentage.
The magazine wonders whether it will all end in a “paternity test bombshell.”
This drivel would be laughable if it weren’t also so despicable.
There is zero actual, legitimate debate about Cruise’s paternity.
The Enquirer is the only outlet still stirring this silly debate six years after Suri’s birth because it’s beneath everyone else.
Sources in the Cruise camp tell Gossip Cop the story is a complete fabrication from a tabloid with a history of smears against the actor.
0 comments:
Post a Comment